|
STAR Graduate Student Thesis Policy:
Draft #2
- The STAR policy on student theses is based on the principles that any
collaborator is free to delve into any aspect of the data, and that the
basic arbiter of what constitutes a thesis is the thesis advisor. The main
purpose of the policy is to state expectations about communication within
the collaboration.
- PWG convenors maintain lists of analysis topics in their areas of
interest which are not yet covered by anyone (includes students, postdocs,
and other categories of collaborator).
- Students and their advisors are free to choose a project from any PWG
convenor's list, or to choose a project that is not listed.
- The chair of the STAR thesis committee works with the Analysis
Coordinator to maintain a descriptive list of all ongoing analysis projects,
including names of all students and non-students working on those projects.
The STAR council member from each institution is expected to submit the
necessary information to keep these listings up-to-date.
- It is anticipated that there will always be many unpursued analysis
projects in STAR, and many new analysis opportunities will open up every
year as new detector subsystems come online, luminosity improves, etc.
The likelihood of independent analyses with a large degree of overlap is
small and will probably decrease with time. However, STAR policy does not
explicitly discourage duplicate analyses.
- In the event that there is a large degree of overlap between two
independent analyses, it is the task of an ad hoc godparent committee
appointed by the spokesperson to draw on material from the independent
analyses and assemble the manuscript for a journal publication.
- In overlap cases involving a student thesis project, it is normally
expected that the student's advisor is a member of the godparent committee.
- Each student who uses STAR data for his/her PhD thesis is expected to
have contributed to the community service aspect of STAR in a significant
way. Usually this will be an amount of work roughly equivalent to one
third to one half the total research effort for a typical PhD.
Perhaps we will remove the last sentence from the final policy, but it
is useful for it to be there at least through the stage of initial
discussion.
- Council members are responsible for ensuring that thesis students
from their own institutions satisfy community service expectations.
- The STAR roster should include a flag to identify students who intend to
use STAR data for a PhD thesis.
Does this need to be written into the STAR policy? If not, it's here just
as a reminder to ask Liz to do it.
- The STAR thesis committee should review the operation of this policy
18 months after it is put into effect.
Return to STAR thesis committee page
July 19, 2000
|